In a direct deal somebody always goes first: either you pay and hope the coins come, or they send and hope the money comes. Whoever goes first is lending the full amount to a stranger with no collateral. Every "who goes first" argument on Telegram or Discord is really the two sides negotiating who takes that risk. The honest answer is that neither should, and the only way to get there is a third thing that holds the crypto while the payment happens.
The order that removes the question
- 1The seller locks the crypto in escrow. On iEscrow it leaves the seller’s balance the moment the trade is accepted.
- 2Only then does the buyer see the payment details and pay. The buyer is not paying someone who can walk away: the coins are already out of the seller’s hands.
- 3The seller confirms the money arrived (by looking at the account, not at a screenshot). The crypto is released to the buyer.
- 4If the seller does not confirm within 30 minutes, the trade escalates to a dispute by itself; if the buyer never pays, the window expires and the crypto returns to the seller. Nobody can cancel a trade once it is accepted.
What a "middleman" does not do
A person who offers to hold the funds is not escrow: they are a third party who now has to be trusted by both sides, and the clone accounts in every deal group exist precisely to be that person. Escrow is not a trustworthy person; it is an order of operations in which no one holds what belongs to the other. See A "guarantor" on Telegram is not escrow.